Why democracy in Hong Kong is the best choice for Beijing
Democracy can be an orderly expression of public preferences to guide government in being responsible to the needs of citizens. Democracy can also be tumultuous chaos, with street protests, feuding factions in government, and repeated confrontations provoking extremist responses.
Officials in Beijing think of democracy in the latter terms, and like to think they can persuade Hong Kong to instead choose a more limited, guided form of government without a fully democratic contest for the chief executive.
Yet they are mistaken; the only real choice they have for Hong Kong is which kind of democracy they will get.
Hong Kong is a highly literate, educated, politically aware society with guarantees under the Basic Law for “freedom of speech, of the press and of publication; freedom of association, of assembly, of procession and of demonstration” (Article 27). The most complete acceptance of the “one country, two systems” principle will not change this.
Any such society is going to give rise to voices calling attention to social issues and problems. In Hong Kong, those issues include inequality, access to higher education, the availability of high-paying professional jobs for Hong Kong graduates, pensions for the elderly, air and water quality, the costs and quality of housing, the need to diversify the economy, and the management of mega construction projects such as the high-speed rail link to Guangzhou and the bridge to Macau.
In regard to all these issues, a society like that in Hong Kong is going to face public demands that the government institute policies that recognise these problems and develop solutions.
If people believe that their government is responsible and accountable to them, and serves them by responding to their concerns, they will follow peaceful and institutional democratic procedures to shape government policies and choose government leaders. Yet if they do not believe that their government is responsible and accountable to them, or that leaders care about their needs, then they are likely to choose the more tumultuous forms of democracy, using protests and confrontations to change the agenda and insist that government leaders pay attention.
If those confrontations produce no results, then the next steps are more extremist demands and actions, including calls to remove government leaders and change the very structure of government. Read more…
- Click to print (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
- Share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Google+ (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
- Click to email (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)