China warns US of retaliation if Trump imposes tariffs
Penny Pritzker, the outgoing US commerce secretary, said in an interview with the Financial Times that Chinese officials had informed their US counterparts in a meeting after November’s election that they would be forced to respond to trade measures taken by the new administration.
“The Chinese leadership said to me ‘If you guys put an import duty on us we are going to do it on you’,” Ms Pritzker said. “And then they said ‘That will be bad for both of us’.”
She said that the next administration needed to decide “the fine line between being tough and a trade war”, cautioning that such a confrontation would have “enormous consequence” for the US.
The move highlights the concern in China over the risk to relations presented by Mr Trump, who has also offended Beijing by breaking with traditional US policy on Taiwan.
Japanese officials and top executives also pushed back against Mr Trump, warning on Friday of fallout for US-Japanese trade and investment if the president-elect followed through on his call to impose a border tax on Toyota to stop the carmaker from building a new plant in Mexico.
He has pledged to label China a currency manipulator and threatened to impose punitive tariffs of up to 45 per cent on Chinese goods, although incoming members of his administration have played down both commitments since the election.
Mr Trump and his advisers argue that ever since China’s 2001 entry into the World Trade Organisation it has been competing unfairly and has caused the loss of millions of American jobs, particularly in manufacturing.
Recent studies by economists have put the total job losses in the US associated with Chinese competition at more than 2m with many of those in areas that voted heavily for Mr Trump in November’s election.
But Ms Pritzker, who was due to meet Wilbur Ross, her successor, on Friday, said that Mr Trump’s zero-sum view of China as simply stealing US jobs was “too simple a characterisation”. She argued that Chinese policy was now focusing on developing domestic industry to take the place of imports.
“If it was so terrible why would American business continue to want to do business in China?” she said. “But I think that the Chinese posture . . . towards foreign-developed products is changing towards favouring indigenous developed products . . . That’s the issue I think that faces the next administration.”
The outgoing commerce secretary said that the US continued to be concerned over what she called the “lack of a level playing field in China”. She cited issues ranging from poor intellectual property protection to Chinese overcapacity in steel production.
She also defended recent US scrutiny of growing Chinese direct investment, which reached a record $45.6bn last year.
The Obama administration last month blocked a Chinese bid for Aixtron, a German chip equipment manufacturer. Beijing has also long complained that its companies face more scrutiny than others from the US Committee on Foreign Investment in the US, which reviews investments on national security grounds.
“It’s not inconsistent to say we welcome foreign investment and yet we want to protect our national security. I think it’s not inconsistent to say we welcome foreign investment but don’t dump your stuff here . . . That’s fair in open trade,” Ms Pritzker said. “You have to adjust for basic imperatives and our national security is really critical.” Read more…